(Untitled)

Mar 07, 2006 10:50

Which would be more deadly?
Zombie Vampires
or
Zombie Ninjas?

No Underworld-esque Zombie-vampire/ninja hybrid theories, please.

geekery

Leave a comment

Comments 26

executrixie March 7 2006, 21:43:40 UTC
Zombie ninja. Hands down.

Whether the zombie wants blood or brains, it just constantly needs to feed. Period. Tack on vengeance, stealth and speed? Oh boy, do I need some more training.

*breaks out nunchucks*

P.S. Pirates are gh3y.

Reply

soliton March 8 2006, 01:13:26 UTC
Just one more contingency to add to the Plan To Counter The Inevitable Future Zombie Uprising: Counter-ninja training.
I'll do whatever I can to prepare.

Reply


ianlyzu March 7 2006, 22:47:13 UTC
technically, vampires turn you into the undead... so which is deadlier???

Reply


love_hate_rape March 8 2006, 01:44:53 UTC
I'm going with a zombie Ronald MacDonald, because that shit will fuck you up.

No light green sweater, tho...

Reply

soliton March 8 2006, 18:02:01 UTC
Silly girl. No zombie possesses the ability to get past Ronnie's awesome offense/defense. Even when unarmed, Ronnie's combat skills are so honed that he could defeat an entire army of zombies without risk of infection. Therefor, there's no possibility that he would ever become a zombie.

Reply


anonymous March 9 2006, 01:20:08 UTC
a normal non-zombie ninja would kick both their asses, duh.

im not falling for the 'dick in your mouth or dick in your ass' trick.

Reply


greyface March 9 2006, 02:40:56 UTC
Wait... is this a question of who would kill more civilians? or who would win in a fight?

In the former case, do zombie-vampires get to bring their zombie wolves and zombie bats along?

Reply

soliton March 9 2006, 17:59:21 UTC
When zombies fight, nobody wins. But I don't think zombies would fight each other. What would be the incentive?

Unless the vampire zombies actually bite and infect their wolves and bats, no. If the animals somehow stem from the vampire itself, then they can be zombified.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up