Ok, I've
made a post to
multividious that I hope clears up what can be posted there. I'm glad I chose the name I did now, because it doesn't have multi-fandom or crossover in the title. Those are 2 sub-genres under the heading of Multi-Source (woohoo for made-up words!). This follows some discussions
here and
here. One of the reasons why I didn't want to call
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
Do you consider a vid that uses Angel and Buffy footage to do a Faith character study a multi-source vid?
Reply
Reply
I'm working on a constructed reality-type vid and I keep going back and forth between thinking it's multifandom and multisource. I can't wrap my head around which it is. :)
Until recently, I didn't even know there was such a fine line when dealing with these types of vids.
Reply
Hey, until recently I just called anything that used more than one source mutli-fandom, so what do I know? These definitions are all kinda subjective. That's why it's been difficult coming up with a clear-cut definition & rules for the comm.
but going by that guideline Lost and Alias wouldn't be a multifandom vid because they are in the same universe. (Drive Shaft was in both series, so they are the same universe)
Hey, weird! I totally forgot about that! Yeah, there's no way I would call a Lost/Alias vid single-fandom.
I think I may just leave the whole spinoff thing unspecified until it actually becomes an issue. Let people make their own judgment calls on that.
Reply
Leave a comment