I have a theory on the health care debate. My theory is this- if you are not in favor of a public option in health care, then you have never needed health care. Because anyone who’s had to deal with an insurance company for any kind of serious health issue can tell you, it is a fight to get anything covered. I know- I’ve been through it. I have
(
Read more... )
Comments 29
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
And yet, when I broke my wrist, my primary physician was completely happy to refuse me physical therapy because according to the billing structure, allowing me to have the PT I needed to be able to work cost HER money. So: she did her very best to deny me the PT I needed.
This model is now being touted as something everyone should have, because it is so "efficient". Yes, it is cheaper- more "efficient"- for insurance companies to deny care than to pay for it, and that is how they make their money.
All of which makes MA's legal mandate that we buy health "insurance" products whether or not they make economic sense or we can afford them, really sick.
I want single-payer, damnit.
Reply
If the public option will help him out, then I'm all about it. I'm a bit ignorant on it though, I'll have to educate myself first.
Why are people so against it...?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
And I still VERY MUCH want a public option.
Reply
*hugs*
Reply
We are so far behind many of the other countries in the world that I almost laugh when we are called a leading force in the world. If by leading they mean that the rich can do whatever they want while the rest of us struggle to make ends meet, then by all means, we are a force. We spend millions of millions of dollars on the poor in other countries but we can't get a health plan that covers hard working and good people on our own soil. It disgusts me.
Good luck!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment