We can has... mediocre sequel of a sequel?

Aug 02, 2008 11:15

Went to see The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emporer last night! \o/

Thoughts, commentary, spoilers )

skys are notorious movie addicts

Leave a comment

Comments 5

shyunpo August 2 2008, 19:00:19 UTC
Ahaha. I thought it was bad meself. I found it not on par as to the rest. But I agree with what you said. Maria Bello was all right, but she wasn't quite Evy. The whole STRIPMENOWSCENE at seduction totally made me LOL though. She just got so physical all of a sudden. Haha.

And, old Alex? LOOKS OLD. x.x; He does not look college age, IMHO!

P.S. & I wouldn't mind my account back on 110, if it's all right! ♥

Reply

skyfrog August 2 2008, 22:30:30 UTC
On the standalone, were there no other Mummy movies to compare to, I prolly would have enjoyed it way more. =/

Left you a slightly tl;dr explanation on Y!M on the accounts thing. ♥

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

skyfrog August 2 2008, 22:30:53 UTC
They had a chemistry, and they did the married-for-a-while well, but it just.. wasn't the same. =/

Reply


splendidshadows August 2 2008, 19:49:36 UTC
Hahaha, yeah, for me it was Jet Li and Michelle Yeoh that made the movie enjoyable. I found the O'Connell pair a tad corny in the beginning, and YES ON ALEX WTF WAS THAT? Dude, ol' Ricky sure ages well. XD

And I don't like what they did with Jonathan's character. I mean, now it's all gags and crap ("the yak, well, yakked!" boo D:) instead of witty humour.

It was still an OK movie though, a nice way to whittle away an afternoon.

Reply

skyfrog August 2 2008, 22:31:34 UTC
Yes, I would say poor Jonathan was the most disappointing part. I missed his slightly useful nature in the first two movies. =/

Reply


Leave a comment

Up