Well I'm Just a Modern Guy...

Nov 21, 2010 10:09

(Of course I've had it in the ear before ( Read more... )

silly, tv, music

Leave a comment

Comments 20

cucumberseed November 21 2010, 15:41:42 UTC
I got handed a story last night based on the explanation of Pac Man
http://kotaku.com/386868/pac+man-explained

Reply

skogkatt November 21 2010, 15:45:39 UTC
O.o

Was it... was it good?

Reply


roane November 21 2010, 16:06:54 UTC
Yes, around here we have a list of things CM has taught us never to do. It's a pretty extensive list. :)

Reply

skogkatt November 22 2010, 13:16:38 UTC
Not all of them are as silly as these, I trust.

Reply


masterae November 21 2010, 17:40:26 UTC
Awww! You are both adorable! This whole post was adorable!

Reply

skogkatt November 22 2010, 13:16:52 UTC
Back atcha, Neilemu!

Reply


aedifica November 21 2010, 18:42:17 UTC
After reading item 3 it occurred to me that Moss probably doesn't *usually* dress like Bunnicula, and perhaps my mental image of the scene you described might be off...

Reply

skogkatt November 22 2010, 13:17:35 UTC
Hee! Moss doesn't usually dress like Bunnicula, and I don't look a thing like Edward Cullen. Not a scintillating arm in sight...

Reply


kirinn November 21 2010, 19:22:15 UTC
Now, I'm pretty sure that what was intended in the fornication story was demon violating people's ears with some sort of genital appendage. But at the end when you said "Demons. Fornicating. In people's ears", the image that instantly popped into my head was one of two very tiny demons, gettin' their sexy times on in someone's ear canal. Perhaps the host would be none the wiser, except for an odd sense of barely registered high-pitched noises which were somehow subtly arousing.

Reply

ext_194791 November 22 2010, 09:52:04 UTC
I assumed that there were two demons fornicating with each other as well!

Reply

skogkatt November 22 2010, 13:18:30 UTC
Honestly, despite the lurid details, it wasn't clear whether my classmate meant for demons to be fornicating with humans or with each other. Your reading is valid.

Reply

aedifica November 22 2010, 14:18:37 UTC
That was my reading too--the violation of ears didn't even occur to me!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up