Mar 25, 2011 10:56
I've read a lot of reviews and comments that accuse Generation 3 of being Americanized and no longer a true representation of teens in Bristol.
What are your thoughts? Has Skins become Americanized? Could the lack of relatable characters be the reason for the ratings decline?
random,
season 5: general discussions,
- news and articles
Leave a comment
Comments 57
Reply
I don't think so. Gen 3 has been far more relatable to me, and I'm Australian. I think it's just a more realistic portrayal of teenagers in general.
Actually, I think a common criticism of the first ep of gen 1 was that it was too Americanized - with Tony focused on Sid having to lose his virginity. Plus the car. But it's funny that Americans don't even find that realistic. I think it was just unrealistic in general.
Reply
That's what I think too.
Reply
Reply
Like someone else said on this, if you were going by episode one on it's own, I would of said that yes, it did quite remind of something Mean Girls-esque, but that would be the only sole reason (ep. 1). I get the whole aspect of weird kid gets bullied by popular girl (Franky-Mini) and that part where Alo/Rich give Franky the lowdown on Mini in the cafeteria was pretty much as "Americanized" as this generation was going to get. All of that drama seemed to happen only inside of college.
But you don't really see the gang in college and when you do, you tend to forget they're even at school, considering they always have these crazy events they need to participate in (ex, runway show, or play). I dunno, I just...I don't see gen 3 skins as Americanized whatsoever.
Still the same awesome, drug-riddled, sex-infested, angsty show I've been watching since gen 1.
Reply
Teens are pretty much the same everywhere. People are. Mini being the Mean Girl doesn't make her Americanized because it relies on the basic characterization of American teen movies. There are Mean Girls everywhere. There are jocks everywhere and stoners and metalheads.
To me it feels like people are grasping for reasons to knock down this generation and build the other generations up.
Effy doesn't seem like a true representation of teens or Cook or Freddie or Tony.
As a Canadian, I still related to certain characters or recognised them, despite the differences between our countries. It's a weak argument.
Reply
Reply
To me it feels like people are grasping for reasons to knock down this generation and build the other generations up.
This.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Honestly, this confuses me. The way this question implies that this generation lacks relatable characters, when-- that isn't really universal at all?
Like, except for maybe Alo, I think I can relate to every single gen3 character in some way, and Frankie is the character I relate to the most out of all Skins series. I get that this is just my personal experience, but... I don't see how this generation lacks relatable characters? (And what does that have to do with the series supposedly being Americanized?)
Reply
That was poor phrasing on my part. Didn't realize until after the fact and I'm too afraid to edit.
Some of the comments that I've read have stated that they found the characters unrelatable. I wondered if that could be one (of many, I'm sure)reasons why the ratings were so low in the UK.
I personally find the cast very relatable.
Reply
exactly, if anything it's way more relatable now than ever
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment