Some time I'll make a post that does my love for Brando justice

May 14, 2009 20:34


So, dudes, I know 20 to 1 is hardly an adequate scientific forum or anything, but. Tonight, they're doing "Hollywood's Hottest Hunks" or something, and Zac Efron is in it. So ha! Validation! And oh god he really has turned out quite nicely hasn't he. lksznvalknv ohgoodnessgrasciousme is that STUBBLE I see?

Also, BRANDO. I am very glad to see that ( Read more... )

so what if i like pretty things, brando, omg how embarrassment, tv, general stupidity, film

Leave a comment

Comments 5

3771 May 14 2009, 11:28:19 UTC
the only reason to kick him out of bed is to f-ck him on the floor

SO STOLEN.

Reply

3771 May 14 2009, 11:28:28 UTC
by me, i mean.

Reply

sjazzmreow May 14 2009, 12:28:57 UTC
Heh. Pretty good, innit.

Reply


phrasemuffin May 14 2009, 15:01:54 UTC
Hells YES Hugh Jackman at number 1! How could he not be?

Also, please tell me that Jakey boy was in there. Please? And that you didn't throw things at the t.v. when the Bert Man called Gyllenhaal's name.

Reply

sjazzmreow May 14 2009, 15:20:11 UTC
Yeah, I don't really get Hugh Jackman. 3771 and I were talking about this the other day, actually. He just does absolutely nothing for me, and I can't percieve him in a sexual context at all. So, um, him being number one is, to me, kinda completely ludacris.

Alas, no Gyllenhaal! And I can asure you that I would never through things at him if he were. He's a dear.
While he is massively more appealing than a lot of the other chaps that did make it onto the list, I can sort of see why he wasn't there. He's not really as well known as the others, and certainly not as well known for heart-throb status. Mostly I was just hugely pleased by how many old school actors from the fifties made it on - Brando, James Dean, Paul Neuman. That was more than I expected from channel nine, lord of the lowest common denominator broadcasting.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up