[ The police officer's voice, which hasn't been heard on the network in a while, is impossibly dry, throaty and low with an out-of-character lassitude ]
It is remarkable what household implements people are capable of converting into deadly weapons, given sufficient motivation.
[ In other words, guess who had to go break up a blossom-fueled
(
Read more... )
Comments 283
[A bit dark but true.]
Reply
[ He sounds more vaguely bemused than alarmed by the notion. ]
It's rather remarkable, when one thinks about it.
Reply
But yes, it is.
Reply
Reply
It's more admirable if one has the skill to wield a blade, if you ask me. Heeheehee -- but oddly I think I'm acquainted with far more people who use blades, more than guns.
As for your question though, I like guns myself.
[But tentacles tended to be more effective.]
Reply
Is that so? [ He sounds like he perks up a little, at that. ] That is a curious thing, in this day and age.
[ And he hasn't forgotten about the tentacles, but he has more sense than to go babbling his friends' secrets, even now. ] Why do you prefer guns? They are a much more recognizable weapon than most blades and much more useful for intimidating people, but I do not think that is the reason you like them.
Reply
I guess it helps when a lot of the people I know are from a far earlier time than this one as well.
[And that's why you're her #1 pal, Fratley.] Because they're easy to use! Eheheheh! Even if you miss a vital target, there's a good chance that you'll at least hit something else and hinder their movements! Plus, as long as you have the right weapon, they're far easier to move around with -- heheh -- and you can still have one hand free, in case you need it!
[Yeah, that's right. This woman can shoot a gun with ONE HAND.]
Reply
Those benefits only apply if you are a reasonably accurate shot-- which, I regret to say, I am not. [ He sounds ... amused, though, instead of horrified like one might reasonably expect. ] I may be adequate with a gun at close range, but I fear my aim is too poor for anything over a hundred paces or so.
Reply
Teeth, nails, feet and fists work just fine. People can steal a weapon but can't take away parts of your own body.
Reply
A fair point. [ Though they can be restrained, he finds himself thinking absently, but doesn't say. And if they're broken, they take a much longer time to heal. ] But the risk is greater when you use such weapons, is it not? I would only use my claws if I had no other recourse.
Reply
The risk is high in a fight no matter what you do. The best way to lower it is to play hard and play dirty.
Reply
Reply
But people will use everything from knives, swords, guns, tanks, poisons, tranquilising weapons and blunt objects. And on top of that, you have far worse options.
Biological warfare, for one.
Reply
Biological warfare. [ He says the words like they're in a foreign but vaguely familiar language-- which, as far as he's concerned, is more or less appropriate. ] I've read of such things. And the precinct still gets calls from those convinced the mushrooms at the baseball diamond were part of a bio-terrorist attack.
Reply
[A low and bitter laugh.] Yes. I know it on an intimate level, unfortunately.
Reply
How so?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
[ And it's gone. ] A weapon I could not hope to defeat is one whose existence I am not aware of. There are few greater dangers than the unknown.
Reply
Leave a comment