(Untitled)

[singingjavert]

I recieved a very interesting personality dissection today from someone I respect. It was an interesting conversation, and the point that sticks out in my mind is this: apparently, for all my public bluster, outcry, lamantation, and elation (circumstances depending, of course), I am a very difficult person to "know", in the sense of thought

Comments

[nebanebet]

Sounds like whoever said that hit the nail on the head.

I've said the same many times myself, if I remember correctly. I never know what the heck you're thinking.

[judyb27]

funny thing... you are out there... some times farther than most but i've never found the need to fully understand you....i like that you have layers. it makes you human. that and i know well enough to know that if anythings wrong, you won't say anything unless i ask you and even then you might not say anything. i love you pat!*judy

[lastjacobin]

Hmmmm... it seems to me that if we knew the same information that you knew, and only that, then your thought pattern would be easier to see. As it is, it seems like you operate in a logical and reasonable fashion (Note inherent difference between men and women).

[singingjavert]

Inherent difference between men and women?
Oh. Heh. ehhhhhh...

THough here's the paradox- do I operate in a logical and reasonable fashion, or just rationalize my actions logically?

[lastjacobin]

No matter how good of a debater you might be, if the actions were completely illogical, then there could be no way to rationalize them with coherent logic.

However, if you use Douglas Jeffers/Hitler logic...

[yourfavorite__]

word to the last one?