Rule change proposal

[hooptytrib]

I thought the late-in-the-week squabbles had some good points buried in them here and there. So how about a rule preventing the outing of simmers' sexualities in secrets? I'm still thinking of how to word it, maybe something like:

Secrets mentioning or alluding to a simmer's sexuality are subject to rejection.Some thoughts on the matter

Comments

[anonymous]

Is one of your rules no bullying?
This whole forum is bullying. Lmfao

[hooptytrib]

Good thing there's no rule against hyperbole!

[anonymous]

No rules against trolling, either, which is good for some anons around here!

[hooptytrib]

Some mods too tbh!

[anonymous]

I see no problem with it. I agree it is more in line with other rules.

[anonymous]

My two cents... idc either way.

[anonymous]

"Secrets mentioning or alluding to a simmer's sexuality are subject to rejection."

"are subject to" really means "might be." If you're going to prevent outing, you need to prevent it. "Secrets mentioning or alluding to a simmer's sexuality will not be accepted."

[anonymous]

Clear, concise and to the point. I agree with this.

[anonymous]

seconded

[radiochocolate]

Thirded.

[anonymous]

"Secrets mentioning or alluding to a simmer's sexuality will not be accepted."

Sounds good to me too. How long before you make this an actual rule?