I was discussing this with a friend earlier. What I've never really 'got' is people wanting to inflict new damage on a character in order then to repair him/her. For me, it's always been about wanting to save characters I love from damage the original writers have imposed upon them in canon: over the years, I just got very annoyed at the fact
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
Most often, though, it's just a kink for most, which doesn't have an explanation as such - it just happens to push some people's buttons.
primeval_denial makes a speciality of saving the characters the creators (also sometimes known as The FuckWits In Charge) love to kill off. Then we sometimes break, mangle and otherwise hurt them in a variety of ways, but rarely fatally. It's just to see what they're made of, in the end.
But pure fixits are very popular. Why kill off all the pretty men?
Reply
Indeed (and women)!
From this week's Sunday-coffee-and-chat-in-Starbucks, I think Elma and I are essentially 'fixit' people. From childhood, we've never liked the fact that authors/film-makers have a knack of killing off or damaging the characters we like best. In terms of "seeing what they're made of" (which I can understand in many ways), that doesn't require inflicting further damage, as far as I can see, because the canon has done more than enough damage already. Indeed, the hardest part can be working out how to save them: in some cases, having to go AU to wind back events a little!
Reply
Don't even bother with George R.R. Martin's Song of Ice & Fire series then. You'd want to put your head in an oven.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment