My Point of No Return

Apr 17, 2005 23:06

I mised my bus back to London this morning, so in an attempt to kill the 3 hours before the next one, I hit up the Eaton's Center, Ian style; I ended up at Sportcheck and bought myself a new pair of uber-sexy biking shorts - tight lyrcra with a padded bum, just the way I like 'em ;) Once I got back to london, still inspired by my purchase, I ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 26

twizzlerfreak April 18 2005, 03:56:57 UTC
"bought myself a new pair of uber-sexy biking shorts - tight lyrcra with a padded bum"

So when will you be modelling that for us? :-D

Reply


obomaboe April 18 2005, 04:14:26 UTC
i never thought the words "sexy" and "biking shorts" could coexist in a sentence, without the words "as a ... {insert something not sexy at all here}" in between....

;)

Ian, if you are around tonight at all or tomorrow even, I need to talk to you ... it's not bad :-)

Reply


vpunny April 18 2005, 04:46:11 UTC
I'd like to mention the fact that we saw each other on the bus to London. Yeah, that's right.

And I would have sat down next to him, near the front of the bus, if some old lady didn't take the spot first.

So I ended up in the back.

And then when we arrived in London, he walked off while I was stuck in the back of the bus waiting for the people in the front to get off. By the time I got off, he had walked off into the distance.

Ian, you walk ridiculously fast.

However, we managed to catch the same Wellington bus, except I boarded many minutes later (the bus was just waiting there). I tapped you on the shoulder but you didn't even respond. I figured you were asleep or just really tired so I didn't disturb you.

You wouldn't have happened to be wearing those shorts on the bus, would you? Because you were wearing some uber-sexy shorts.

Although you might want to consider shaving your legs.

Just kidding. You've got nice legs. ;)

Reply

silverswimfish April 18 2005, 05:02:43 UTC
It's true, we were on the same bus ( ... )

Reply

vpunny April 18 2005, 18:52:08 UTC
Eh, no worries. I can't help it if I'm a forgettable person.

And yeah, the shorts you wore didn't look like they had a padded bottom. They sure didn't look like biker shorts, so I don't know what I was talking about. It could be the fact that I'm not exactly sure what biker shorts are. I don't wear shorts when I bike. In fact, I haven't biked in a while. I also don't wear shorts in public, because I don't like my legs. Maybe I should shave them. Nah.

By the way, you're welcome. ;)

Reply

*AHEM* itsumademo_ai April 18 2005, 19:06:53 UTC
you have VERY sexy legs ;) and I'm looking forward to seeing them all summer long...sw33t...

Reply


You best bring those bike shorts to the national capital anonymous April 18 2005, 15:51:01 UTC
Ian, you should really consider doing this tri, i think you'll love it! a bunch of my friends, as well as myself, are doing it and we have festivities afterwards, so it's sure to be an awesome day. after all, a 1.5 km swim + 45km bike + 10km run isnt THAT bad....wait? is it? ah well!

ttys! stay classy,

Linds :)

Reply

Re: You best bring those bike shorts to the national capital silverswimfish April 22 2005, 05:29:19 UTC

There;s no one I'd rather immasculate myself infront of than you m'dear; I'll definitely book the 31st off so you and your friends can beat me madcore - I have faith that I could keep up on the first couple legs, but as for the last . . . ; Oh how I hate running . . .

---> I.

Reply


twizzlerfreak April 20 2005, 05:59:30 UTC
Ian, whatever I can do to convince you to shave your legs again, I will :-Þ

*hates hair*

I just did a full shave today actually. I'm all clean again and it feels wonderful! :-D

Ian = ridiculously sexy
Hair = not sexy

Ian = no hair

See, it's been mathematically proven! You can't disobey the laws of nature, otherwise the entire universe will come crashing down!

Reply

silverswimfish April 22 2005, 05:30:46 UTC

Well, depending on how I feel, I may need to play the intimidation card at the Tri., which means a grand shaving of body hair, but we shall see . . .

---> I.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up