Swatting Google Buzz

Feb 13, 2010 19:01

Google Buzz got rolling a few days ago, but we have got off on the wrong foot, Buzz and I ( Read more... )

news

Leave a comment

Comments 6

mamarabbit February 14 2010, 02:29:25 UTC
And I thought Facebook was far too public! I hope you've let Google have it, pretty much the way you've enumerated it here. How could they not have thought of all the ramifications????

Reply


kiarda February 14 2010, 02:55:03 UTC
I'm a little bit confused-- you have to link a twitter acct to Buzz in order for it to show up, so if you want to post things under a pseudonym, you could just get a twitter acct and not link it to your gmail.

If you never actually "buzz", then what is there for an unwanted follower to get ahold of?

Also, I signed up willingly, and it let me pick which of my contacts I wanted to follow, and it looks like there is an option to block people. It does suck that their default option sounds stupidly broken, but I don't really see how being signed up for buzz and then never using it actually causes you any trouble.

(I'm not trying to be difficult, I really just don't get it)

Reply

silversliver February 14 2010, 12:24:52 UTC
I think it's most irksome that I was signed up even though I indicated I did not want to participate. At least I thought that's what I said. Then to make it so, I still had to do an elaborate dance with the wind blowing the right way. It's like getting an insurance plan in the mail that subscribes you unless you make a series of phone calls to opt out (true story, but thankfully not mine).

I don't want it, I asked it not to include me, and I then had to spend my precious time to figure out how to turn it off and actually do so. This is the opposite of every other service I use. If a single click were enough to un-enroll, and if contacts were on a configuration page in sign-up rather than automatically chosen, I'd only be mildly miffed.

Reply

kiarda February 16 2010, 02:55:52 UTC
Hope you saw the news today (many sources, you could just, um, google it), that Google is backpedaling, apologizing, and adding more straightforward ways to turn it off.

Not as good as spending two brain cells on it in the first place, but better than nothing.

Reply

silversliver February 16 2010, 04:49:43 UTC
Thanks for the heads up. It looks like they've made some reasonable improvements.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

silversliver February 14 2010, 23:19:25 UTC
They're alright. I was cranky, headachy, and frustrated yesterday, and they were stomping and carrying on. It's not their fault being happy about the biggest holiday of the year.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up