So lately I've been talking with some friends about whether or not SF is dead. Well, for me, that's asking what they think, and then listening. And then I get all firey and pugnacious and slam my onager jawbone in the dirt and say by gum, someone just needs to revive the sucker. (And because I'm half insane, I frequently intimate that Ta-da!
(
Read more... )
Comments 17
I'm reading a lovely light-but-hard SF book at the moment, that combines the aesthetics of wine and cloth with nanotech, interstellar expansion (albeit everything's set in one city so far), and even passing references to brane theory, etc. So it's not dead, just displaced, IMNSHO?
Reply
Tangent --
http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/4769125-glas
Post script:
It doesn't help SF that both the media and certain political groups hate science.
(And I'm not slamming any one party, both have Luddite factions.)
Reply
Reply
(Have you read The Year of the Flood yet? I have to go read Oryx and Crake still...)
Reply
Reply
Reply
These days, the two genres seem to comingle pretty easily. I set forth as an example a lot of stuff by CJ Cherryh, any number of things by Elizabeth Bear, and quite a few things by C.S. Friedman. There are also a number of "space operas" that could go either way as to whether they are scifi or fantasy.
So I think it depends on your definition. Hard Sci-Fi is still being written, but for anything else, the boundaries are not clear anymore.
Reply
I'm sick of vamps, zombies, painfully earnest teen romances and dopey "Raewen, daughter of the wizard Oelthorpe looked out from her tower. It was grey, she was betrothed to Lord Loser who she found disgusting." The dominant genres have all been worked to death. All I see is crap. That's negative space we can fill.
Your story about the singer and the native woman, I liked it very much. You involved me with the characters. No way did I see that ending coming. Slam that onager jaw in the sand, man, break stuff with it.
Reply
Leave a comment