[psych/pshrinkery, DSM5] "DSM 5 Has Flunked Its Reliability Tests"

May 10, 2012 02:31

Frances Allen, MD, (famously the chair of the DSM-IV Task Force and thorn in DSM-5's side) reported Sunday that at the APA meeting (convention), the results of the field trial of the new DSM definitions were presented... and they were dire: For context, in previous DSM's, a diagnosis had to have a kappa reliability of about 0.6 or above to be ( Read more... )

dsm5, psych, pshrinkery

Leave a comment

Comments 5

en_ki May 10 2012, 06:52:48 UTC
Those confidence intervals are enormous. Did they get, like, three patients?

Reply

siderea May 10 2012, 16:57:04 UTC
I vote some of the sites discovered polyhedral dice.

Reply


ron_newman May 10 2012, 12:27:56 UTC
Are there any similar studies of reliability for non-psychiatric medical diagnoses?

Reply

siderea May 10 2012, 16:56:06 UTC
There must, somewhere.

Reply


ron_newman May 10 2012, 12:56:00 UTC

Leave a comment

Up