...Sucralose is an artificial sweetener. It was accidentally discovered in 1976 by Leslie Hough and Shashikant Phadnis at Queen Elizabeth College. While researching ways to use sucrose as a chemical intermediate in non-traditional areas, Phadnis was told to test a chlorinated sugar compound. Phadnis thought that Hough asked him to taste it, and so
(
Read more... )
I was thinking recently, that our descendants may literally have water whether they like it or not. Acesulfame is not broken down by bacteria, plants, or animals and so it accumulates in the wastewater and gets into the environment. I've read that in most of the US (minus the Great Lakes) the reservoires (especially, with the reclaimed water) are already contaminated with acesulfamate to the tune of 10 ug/L, and that in Switzerland the tap water (! - that's after ion exchange!) contains 2 ug/L. That's after just 50 years of use of this sweetener in carbonated drinks! As it is >300 times sweeter than sugar, in a few centuries it may reach the level when water would taste slightly sweet!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Perhaps you may add the microbe to your sweet Armageddon scenario. Surely, if nothing will be done, a superbug will eventually arise in all our waters. It will eat acesulfame and grow, it will be everywhere. And when the acesulfame will be finished, the angry superbug will attack everyone around, from land and sea. Our civilization will be finished by unthinkable diseases. Anyone would prefer a scientist to remove acesulfame from water, rather than cultivating a sweet-tooth Nemesis for all humanity.
BTW, I was always confused by this milk-and-honey Eden image. Didn't they think it through? The honey will be all covered with insects, ugh! And, even more horribly, the milk skin. It must form little white islands on the milk rivers, yuck!
Reply
Acesulfame does not look like something worth cleaving, because N-CO and N-S bonds are very strong. The only reaction I remember is deamidation of asparagine that invoves a cyclical imide, it is then oxidized to --NH and HO2C-. This requires energy and it is done for carboxymethylation. Getting energy FROM the imides looks like the losing proposition to me. Perhaps the best it can do is to use it in some chemistry, e.g. Gabriel synthesis. But that's brand-new in microbial chemistry. Perhaps it would require very long time to figure out...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment