Comments | severina2001: Vanished - that amazing article.

severina2001

Vanished - that amazing article.

Sep 06, 2006 08:32

So I just read the Gale article that a lot of people have already posted the link to (thank you, all you fab flist people!)

I debated reading it, because someone specifically said it mentions a spoiler for Ep.7 that is related to the Gale-leaves rumour. Did I *want* to know? Turns out I did. So: Warning for Spoiler Virgins. It IS spoilery for ( Read more... )

actor: gale harold, tv: vanished

Comments 9

lunachickk September 6 2006, 13:15:08 UTC

OMG, that article still has me LMAO.

severina2001 September 7 2006, 12:09:31 UTC

That reporter is SO one of us.

... Now I wanna know who it is.

jackieb78 September 6 2006, 14:40:10 UTC

THAT thing that you mention- I agree. Could be anything at all! I don't know anything about THAT, so I couldn't spoil you if I wanted to. =D

severina2001 September 7 2006, 12:11:11 UTC

I know! I came up with two possible explanations for THAT in about 15 seconds.

You are also spoiler free? GOOD GIRL.

joesther September 6 2006, 14:56:04 UTC

Thanks for this link, sweetie. I'm feeling a bit... better?... I don't know if that's the term, but yeah, maybe... about episode 7. Probably because of their "not everything is what it seems" comment. But we'll see. Only time will tell, after all.

It's a great article. And I laughed out loud about the "hey, Vanished fangirl, want to see a picture?" thing. Because I've seen people do that and it's silly as hell.

And you know, I have to admire him for wanting the work to speak for itself without resting on his laurels of past accomplishments. Everything I read about him, I like him more. He's doing good work, and if he is kicked off (I have no idea either; I'm spoiler-free as well), well, it'll be because Fox are idiots.

severina2001 September 7 2006, 12:13:05 UTC

I liked that quote too. :)

And that reporter is so completely one of US. I think some of that stuff mentioned in the article is flocked. Isn't it? HEE.

YAY FOR SPOILER VIRGINS!

joesther September 7 2006, 13:49:36 UTC

Is it flocked? I'm not sure. I'm so out of the loop these days. But if it's not, it probably should/could be. ;)

I think there are a lot of places they could take that scene, other than to his death, as I told you over IM. You never know. I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

tamalinn September 6 2006, 20:08:59 UTC

thanks for linking to the article. i'm ambivalent about gale continuing on the series. i mean, i don't want to see his career tank, but on the other hand, now i feel obligated to keep watching a show i'm not enjoying (at all).

i loved the pilot. when it was all focused on kelton (even if he did keep all his clothes on the whole time. wtf is up with that?). now it's all focused on the senator and marcy, and i don't care about them. i'm all, GO BACK TO KELTON! HE'S THE MONEYMAKER! but do they listen to me? no. *sigh*

severina2001 September 7 2006, 12:16:12 UTC

See, I disliked the first two eps quite intensely,and then in Ep.3 it suddenly became crazy and crack-y what with Marcy's incredibly bad acting and Instant Waterworks, and agents talking to their wrists, and Gale's OMG WE LOST HIM face. So now I'm behind it. Oh yes.

Even if he does leave, I don't think it's a reflection on Gale at ALL. I mean, actors often do TONS of pilots/cancelled shows before they find the one that works.

Those execs should be listening to YOU, though.