Today has been a day of dancing and madness at the Delays hovel. And also a day of jaws hitting floors so often that I've had to get my handlamp out to scour under the furniture for those that detached and rolled away. Why such expressions of joy? Because London Underground managers have been found to be idiots, conspirators, lawbreakers and such
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Incidentally, before I worked for TfL I had to get to exams through a strike. I managed it. Mostly by getting up early and taking the bus. When I was doing A levels the local education authority routinely scheduled some exams on a public holiday. Buses ran every hour from my small town. I needed two buses to get into college so I had to leave three hours early so as to get a connecting bus. Sometimes there is inconvenience in life. You'll be fine. Good luck with your exams and future plans.
Reply
Reply
Can you have a cost benefit decision? In theory, yes. But the costs are, in this case, so high that I do not believe someone has made a clinical decision to dismiss on that basis. Given the stringency of the ORR requirements and what you describe above, it may not have been unreasonable that serious disciplinary action was taken. Without knowing the case, it's hard to make a comment.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Mmmm, ET's a bit of a mixed bag. The result can depend on the sympathies of the decision makers, who can be quite partisan. It depends how good your solicitors are and, most frustratingly of all, it depends on a whole bundle of administrative technicalities. A claimant or respondant can have behaved immaculately well in practice but not have recorded everything in an appropriate manner and *ping* lost case.
If an ET found in favour and made an award for unfair dismissal, the award would not only include the statutory element, it would include a compensatory award based on the expected loss of future earnings in the current economic climate at the actual net salary of the claimant. That could be a year's net salary....
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
As to whether he deserved some sort of disciplinary action, absolutely! But that offence does not merit sacking and I've never heard of anyone sacked for that sole offence. The judge makes it clear that he did not believe that Eammon was sacked because he made an error. The evidence was that he was sacked because he was a trade union rep and the charges brought against him were used to do that. Ask yourself this: If it was such a serious offence that a person should be sacked for it then why did the person ordering the action receive no penalty? If it is so bad then both should have been sacked. Instead the judge agreed that there had been duplicity in protecting the Line Controller in order to sack the trade unionist.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment