I've been wrestling this past week with a decision that wasn't easy for me to make: breaking up with a show that is still ongoing. But I've always believed that once the joy and/or fascination you take from something you're fannish about doesn't outweigh the elements that cause you anger or boredom anymore, it's time to move on, rather than being
(
Read more... )
Comments 23
And I wouldn't have hung on to Supernatural through Season 3 if the fans hadn't been so awesome, but Season 4 is notably better.
Reply
And I got the no-long-term-plans thing when they killed Isaac back in S1. Killing off my favourite character didn't endear the show to me ;)
Reply
Granted, I've been breaking up with the show ever since they killed Nathan for the second time - and I still think they simply don't know what to do with the character, which has been very evident in this season, as well - but ironically, the final straw was the Hiro storyline this week. I find it appalling what they've been doing to that character.
(I abhor the Sylar storyline, as you're able to guess, but I've been rather cynical about that one, so I can almost shut it out.)
As for Kring, I see your point, and I agree, but calling his audience names and sounding as if he begrudges both his writers and his actors their jobs simply doesn't make him look all that stellar. He most of all seems to have a publicity problem.
Reply
Reply
I think something similar happened in NCIS season four, when the showrunner came up with a story arc that no one really cared about (except him, possibly) as the pacing was very odd... way too long a setup, never enough pay-off, and the whole thing just didn't make a lot of sense in the first place. Then Bellisario left the show after season four, and his successor managed to pick up the various pieces, threw some out completely and modeled the rest into an arc that actually works.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment