Well as long as Hydra's still there I'm happy. Though. If Pluto isn't a planet is Hydra still considered a moon? I really need to catch up on my astronomy...
Is that one of the three satellites? That's what they are now -- satellites. I think only planets have satellites that can be termed as "moons", but they didn't cover it in their definition, so who knows...
Well, to be more exact, Pluto was disqualified because it didn't clear the debris disk in its neighborhood. Purportedly the Trans-neptunian objects (anything that either crosses or is beyond Neptune's orbit) are, themselves, debris outside of the classic orbital plane. As Pluto is in Neptune's path, but not within it's orbital disk, it is merely an interloper, and not considered bad planetary housekeeping on Neptune's part
( ... )
These criticisms were injected into the article after I linked it (and I echoed them in my addendum), and now I see you saying it too. These seem like such gaping holes that you'd think more people would have stopped to think. Speaking of which, "a conclusion is just a place where you've stopped thinking". That's especially true of this conclusion, which has the aforementioned holes in it.
And a dwarf "planet" isn't a planet? WTCHOP? What's wrong with planetoid?
There's already a petition circulating that proposes the issue be reopened so that the other 9,500 or so astronomers that are registered with the IAU be allowed to vote on the issue. Currently only about 500 are in on the gig.
Comments 11
Reply
You know, one day it might get close enough to Neptune to become a satellite or crash into it, and then the point will be moot.
~Sean
Reply
Reply
*cries*
~Sean
Reply
Reply
~Sean
Reply
Reply
And a dwarf "planet" isn't a planet? WTCHOP? What's wrong with planetoid?
~Sean
Reply
Meep
Reply
( ... )
Reply
~Sean
Reply
Leave a comment