A question for the floor.

Apr 21, 2015 08:16

So:

Shortly before I left for New York (beginning of February, for those keeping track) and began the wonderful whirlwind that has been my spring convention season, I opened a hardship giveaway. Because of the timing of the trip, winners were not selected before I left, and have, in fact, not been selected yet. Since then, two more books have ( Read more... )

common questions

Leave a comment

Comments 18

gammelor April 21 2015, 15:41:16 UTC
I'm tempted to say: do a drawing from the original, and do a separate one for the two "new" books. However, I realize that means more work for you, so I'm hesitant about the idea. I guess if it were me doing it, I'd draw from the original now and sometime down the road do another drawing. Caveat: I'm not personally affected, so it would be better to see what people eligible for the books have to say.

Reply

seanan_mcguire April 21 2015, 16:22:03 UTC
The reason there was an original drawing is that people donated postage costs. I can't afford to pay postage beyond that right now, so it's either "all original" or "all new."

Reply

gammelor April 21 2015, 16:37:41 UTC
Ah, I see. In that case, I guess I'd say do a new drawing.

Reply


elliemurasaki April 21 2015, 15:47:31 UTC
Do a new post with the updated book information, I say. It will not likely hurt anyone who threw their name in the hat for the old post to do the same for the new post.

Reply

seanan_mcguire April 21 2015, 16:22:16 UTC
Thanks for the feedback!

Reply


vettecat April 21 2015, 17:05:54 UTC
Since the original applicants may not still be watching for a "you won!" post at this point, it probably makes sense to start over.

Reply

seanan_mcguire July 21 2015, 19:15:10 UTC
Truth.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

seanan_mcguire July 21 2015, 19:15:22 UTC
This was the right call.

Reply


ladypoetess April 21 2015, 17:38:24 UTC
As one of the people who entered the original, I'd say make the apologies if you feel more is necessary, and then do a new drawing. I'm not sure my answers will change much, but the option is nice to have. :)

Reply

seanan_mcguire July 21 2015, 19:15:32 UTC
This was the right call.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up