This is a topic that's been sitting in my rolling note file for a while, waiting both for the sting of the event that triggered it to fade, and for the actual event to recede far enough into the past that even a vague description wouldn't trigger a big red SPOILERS sign. So you know, it took more than two years. That's a long time, even for me
(
Read more... )
Reply
Part of why I insisted on a blatantly female pseudonym was that I looked at Feed and went "holy crap all the girls." But I was never killing women to cause male pain. I was killing characters to serve the story. I didn't mean for there to be so many dead girls. :( On the other hand...how many genre shows could have that many dead girls, because how many would have that many girls to kill?
Reply
Excellent (and very sad) point. There's a high female body count, but only because so many were out there in the line of fire.
One thing I loved about Buffy is that she was a Queen of the Geeks and girly. Too often girl geeks only wear t-shirts and jeans and sneaks, aren't attractive (or if they are, they're clueless about doing their hair and make up), have no social skills,...you know the drill. Buffy was wicked smart and, yeah, her style might raise an eyebrow or two, but she had a style and she had flair and she had a social life.
Reply
Actually, there are also a lot of girl geeks who deliberately dress down despite knowing exactly what they're doing with girly stuff, simply because otherwise their geek cred isn't taken seriously. Which is a whole 'nother issue.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment