Greenfields += 1

Feb 12, 2009 10:49

For those of you who don't write code, that subject line means that the Greenfield family is expanding by one ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 7

mrissa February 12 2009, 16:03:47 UTC
As I said on the phone: YAY!

Reply

seagrit February 12 2009, 16:07:36 UTC
Jeff sort of jokingly tried out some names on Amber yesterday, and her tastes match ours remarkably well so far... :) She likes some of the names that were toward the top of our list last time. Although when asked directly what we should call the baby, she came up with some really odd sounds, like "shoocah" and "mooroo".

Reply

mrissa February 12 2009, 16:11:15 UTC
Last time you did not discuss Amber's potential names or sex in advance, so I didn't ask because I figured you didn't want to talk about it last time. If you feel like talking about it this time, I'd be interested. I just don't want to get nosy.

Reply

seagrit February 12 2009, 16:18:10 UTC
Not to be discussed in public this time either, but I might be more lenient about sharing with people who will keep it private, especially if I need help sorting through baby clothes. I'm not sure what Jeff will think about that though.

Reply


gaaldine February 12 2009, 18:55:17 UTC
Congratulations! My brother and sister-in-law are expecting their second child in March. Kallie, my three-year-old niece, keeps telling them that she is getting BOTH a baby brother and sister and that they are both "in the cage."

She is very insistent that there will be 2 babies and that my sister-in-law's body is a cage. So, at least Amber seems content with one baby and hasn't thought about locking babies up yet. :)

Reply


fieryjane February 14 2009, 18:24:14 UTC
As I said to Jeff yesterday, congratulations on baby #2!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up