Opinions please.

May 26, 2009 08:54

I came across a pic of HCL-era Hugh & Callum that is very similar to one we've all seen before.

Help me out here, is it the same pic reversed and rotated? Or is it slightly different? I can't decide. It may just be that the newer pic is brighter.

The two pics )

hcl, poll, hugh picpsam, ckr.picspam

Leave a comment

Comments 34

brooklinegirl May 26 2009, 13:11:53 UTC
I just spent WAY too long studying it. It's hard to tell, but I DO think they're different!

Reply

scriggle May 26 2009, 13:44:22 UTC
hueradys and lamentables have proved they're the same using photo shop.

You can see more detail in the second one because it's brighter.

Reply


primroseburrows May 26 2009, 13:15:10 UTC
I said yes first then changed it to no. It seems like you can Callum's eyes better in the second. I'm thinking it was taken either at the same time with a different camera or it was the next/previous shot. Either way, it's definitely reversed. I should have picked 'maybe', but I'm sticking with no.

Reply

scriggle May 26 2009, 13:52:07 UTC
hueradys and lamentables have proved they're the same using photo shop.

I think it's the difference in brightness makes them look different.

Reply

primroseburrows May 26 2009, 18:46:57 UTC
I think you're right. It was just the eyes that were bugging me, because the positions are the same.

Reply


heuradys May 26 2009, 13:15:24 UTC
I tried it in Photoshop. The scale on the 2nd one is slightly skewed from the first, but if you adjust for that, they line up precisely after flipping & rotating. See? This is the WFP shot at 36% opacity dropped over the first one and adjusted for scale.


... )

Reply

lamentables May 26 2009, 13:34:31 UTC
You're more patient than I am; I got it close enough to convince myself and stopped :-)

Reply

heuradys May 27 2009, 00:37:59 UTC
Hee! I was going to futz around with the levels too, but I'm not that patient.

Reply

scriggle May 26 2009, 13:42:09 UTC
Conclusive proof. *g*

I thought it might have been the brightness that made it look different. You can see more of CKR's smile in the reversed one.

Reply


lamentables May 26 2009, 13:17:47 UTC

... )

Reply

scriggle May 26 2009, 13:42:56 UTC
I'm glad people on my flist a PhotoShop proficient.

I thought it might have been the brightness that made it look different. You can see more of CKR's smile in the reversed one.

Reply

heuradys May 27 2009, 00:38:51 UTC
I heart your version because it feels like a drunk test... Instead of touching their own noses, they're touching the viewer's.

Reply

lamentables May 27 2009, 05:17:55 UTC
*g*

Reply


inathunderstorm May 26 2009, 13:39:39 UTC
I think they are the same, but all I know is, I'm kind of O_O because CALLUM YOUR COLLAR IS REALLY HOT, OKAY.

::is very shallow::

Reply

scriggle May 26 2009, 13:52:47 UTC
*joins you in the shallow end of the pool*

Reply


Leave a comment

Up