data mining

Oct 28, 2005 10:15

I'm watching ( Read more... )

data mining, poker

Leave a comment

Comments 11

andrewhime October 28 2005, 15:39:29 UTC
Yeah, I just wish:

it weren't so hard to get hands from UB

and

the info was actually that useful at Omaha 8.

Reply


787style October 28 2005, 15:40:57 UTC
Try PokerAce. I liked it better than PlayerView, especially the real time display of holecards on the screen.

Reply

corey_m October 28 2005, 16:07:29 UTC
I like Poker Ace Hud better too.

Reply


gunga_galunga October 28 2005, 15:46:06 UTC
And this will accelerate the downfall of online poker. Basically, it becomes a never ending arms race of technology where the sheep get skinned instead of sheared.

Reply

787style October 28 2005, 16:55:02 UTC
They get skinned in NL. No amount of technology is going to increase limit poker beyond shearing.

Reply


darth_xed October 28 2005, 18:00:37 UTC
Why waste time , effort, and money on all this stuff when you can just shove All-In on every hand?

Reply


spidurman October 28 2005, 20:24:47 UTC
This is half the reason I play non holdem and play tournament structure so much. I don't want to spend the frigging time or energy to do this, and I don't want to be penalized for that.

I prefer to force myself to learn hand-reading and related skills. Any online play I do is all about training to play live poker anyway.

And I slightly disagree - the most valuable information is what this stuff doesn't pick up....how does he play a flush draw, what causes a slowplay, etc. Also the good players are constantly adjusting, and numeric reliance misses these adjustments.

Reply

oscarmc October 28 2005, 20:39:32 UTC
And I slightly disagree - the most valuable information is what this stuff doesn't pick up....

The most valuable info is pretty simple. Who plays lots of hands and loses lots of money. Find those players and play with them. I dont much care how they play a flush draw, just that they play lots of them.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up