This unsettles me greatly. I know that in the grand economic scheme, it's ideal for ensuring steady work and pay for those who, presumably, won't necessarily alight in more creative or progressive careers, but there's sort of retro-Dickensian/Orwellian about it.
Maybe it's just me.
Comments 3
When I first moved to Cali, gosh probably around 1980 or '81, I worked for a while at a place called the "Skills Center," which was part of a local community college. There were many clients (it was a free service) who had quit school, wanting to get out of jobs such as working at MickyD's who paraded in.
The way the Skills Center did it was, they both administered the GED test (the more traditional way for those of us who quit school early to get a high school degree), and worked with large local employers of the time -- General Dynamics, Convair, like that -- administering tests in things like "mechanical ability" and "spatial reasoning" -- and those who scored high enough in the desired categories would become paid-trainee employees of the big companies, getting truly decent pay for their on-the-job training ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment