You know... for all the complaints about it, I must say that lust can be quite lovely, really. After all, lust is only a strong desire. The urge to taste something, or to hold it. To touch it.
[At this point, video flickers on. Roxanne appears, at the moment, to be lounging on a rather fluffy set of red blankets and pillows, wearing the basic
(
Read more... )
Comments 60
Lust or desire let loose is animalistic, base, unrefined. The way a starving man and a dog eats is the same. To let your desires take hold of you is to give up control, and so become nothing more than the desires themselves, surrendering what of your mind you have.
Without control, the capacity to know what "wanting" is becomes non-existent. Without lack, there can be no knowledge of having. It is control, and not desire, that retains a being's humanity.
Reply
Not that I'm one to suggest becoming entirely ruled by that kind of thing. [The key word being "entirely."] But, of course, I'm not talking about the gorging one embarks upon when starved. I'm talking about sensation. Savoring.
To indulge because you choose to. I suppose you could call that a certain sort of control, too.
Reply
Revolting behaviour, really.
Reply
I don't see what's so admirable about asceticism!
Reply
Me! That's me! You didn't really sign up, did you?
Reply
Reply
Reply
I did! I needed to do something, you know. For the sake of buying... well, whatever needs to be bought.
Reply
Leave a comment