I think I'm much like most folks in that I "know", from my perch atop the barstool, what's best for my city/country/world/whaddevah, and I do pontificate about it in this journal quite a bit to you, my long-suffering captive audience. I think I'm unlike most in at least two respects: first, I don't necessarily happen to be drunk when I do so -
(
Read more... )
Comments 10
In terms of trucks and trains, there is a proposal/desire/pipe-dream to see a European style trucks-on-trains system on the 81.
Reply
You.walk.the.walk,man...and.I.for.one.greatly.admire.you.for.that.
Today.was.one.of.those.oppressive.days.at.Azkaban.where.I.was.talking
with.others.who.want.to.go.from.stodgy.and.hierarchical^rewards^based
to.linear.and.communicative,but.cannot.get.active.buyin.from.the
leadership.there.because.there.is.too.much.at.risk.for.the.indi^
vidual.career.climber.and.the.person.who.hoards.rather.than.shares.
This.was.one.of.our.most.outspoken.champions.and.she.was.at.her
wits.end.about.it.
Sometimes.it.is.all.we.can.do.to.stand.up.straight...but.some.of
us.actually.MOVE.FORWARD...Right.on,man.
Reply
Reply
Also, you cannot use high-speed lines for freight. That has been proven to degrade track at a tremendous rate and cause derailments. One of Amtrak's biggest safety issues is that it runs on the same lines used for freight. The problem is exacerbated with the special kind of track you need for high-speed rail, as the Germans unhappily were forced to learn.
There are, in fact, practicalities involved.
Reply
Most of the proposals I've heard of for high-speed rail in the U.S. are for the very northeast corridor that gets all the traffic. (It really isn't up to standards of other countries; even the MARC has only one fully electric route.) It does seem, however, that improving the one line that's already doing well rather than improving other lines around the country is...counter-intuitive.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment