I do read rec lists and often find one or two books to add to my to-read list. But I feel like they're more efficient when they're not just a list, but add short summaries and/or a few thoughts on the books. Also, lgbtqreads regularly does 5-book rec lists on a particular theme, which is an interesting approach.
I get great joy out of lists, but that's just because I find lists themselves fun. (Probably has something to do with my mildly obsessive temperament. :D )
I prefer the oddly specific reader generated lists on Goodreads over "best of" or "you should totally have read all of these books if you really want to be considered a real reader of this genre" lists, though. (I've also been known to wander around in total strangers' public wishlists on Amazon and see what they've been reading. Heh.)
More specific recommendations are harder to fake. "Best" is subjective. "The main character of this is a mother" or "has clinical depression" will mark you out as truthful or a liar very quickly.
I just last night finished The Privilege of the Sword, which I read specifically on your recommendation, and it's added to your already high credibility as someone from whom to learn about books. This isn't a case of "sartlorias said it was good, so I'll read it"'; it's more like "sartorias said it has certain specific features, and those features appeal to me, so I'll read it." And that's probably not as much help as I would like, because I'm not sure what those features were! But you somewhat regularly point out things about a book that resonate with me, and so far, when I've followed up on such a thing, I've never been disappointed
( ... )
Oh, that's interesting! I don't have any book sense. I've been burned badly by what I thought would be instant loves, and was totally wrong.
I'm always trying to figure out why a book worked, or when I review something I was ambivalent about, try to figure out what might work for others. Good that it sometimes is successful!
(I was in the process of adding this when you replied:)
I would never bother looking at a list of a hundred books. I might look at a list of twenty, out of curiosity, but I wouldn't be expecting to follow up on it. I do need to have actual details about the book picked out, and few lists of that length can do so, and by the time I got through twenty entries I think they might all be blurring. My own imagination tends to come up with lists of three examples of something-for example, Guns of the Dawn, Too Like the Lightning, and The Traitor Baru Cormorant as three novels inspired by the French Enlightenment-but I think anything up to half a dozen is manageable.
Things I specifically liked about The Privilege of the Sword included the portrayal of training in a skill; the Little Tailor plot, as Heinlein calls it (this did not read to me as Boy Meets Girl); the "you can't go home again" scene (another Heinleinian note); the running storyline about Katherine and Artemisia finding inspiration in a romantic novel about swordsmanship and a
( ... )
Word of mouth works, in the sense that I will make an effort to find an author's work, with a source whose taste I know overlaps with mine to a decent degree. I found Andrea Host through one of your posts, for which my eternal thanks. It can also work with a sufficiently specific review, whether positive or negative.
After that, whether I read the book or not depends on the random-page-reading test. If I don't immediately start re-writing the sentences in my head, I will probably give it a go.
Comments 11
Reply
Sometimes I think the 100 books or authors list is overwhelming. Five at a crack, on a theme, I think is easier to deal with.
Reply
Reply
I prefer the oddly specific reader generated lists on Goodreads over "best of" or "you should totally have read all of these books if you really want to be considered a real reader of this genre" lists, though. (I've also been known to wander around in total strangers' public wishlists on Amazon and see what they've been reading. Heh.)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I'm always trying to figure out why a book worked, or when I review something I was ambivalent about, try to figure out what might work for others. Good that it sometimes is successful!
Reply
I would never bother looking at a list of a hundred books. I might look at a list of twenty, out of curiosity, but I wouldn't be expecting to follow up on it. I do need to have actual details about the book picked out, and few lists of that length can do so, and by the time I got through twenty entries I think they might all be blurring. My own imagination tends to come up with lists of three examples of something-for example, Guns of the Dawn, Too Like the Lightning, and The Traitor Baru Cormorant as three novels inspired by the French Enlightenment-but I think anything up to half a dozen is manageable.
Things I specifically liked about The Privilege of the Sword included the portrayal of training in a skill; the Little Tailor plot, as Heinlein calls it (this did not read to me as Boy Meets Girl); the "you can't go home again" scene (another Heinleinian note); the running storyline about Katherine and Artemisia finding inspiration in a romantic novel about swordsmanship and a ( ... )
Reply
After that, whether I read the book or not depends on the random-page-reading test. If I don't immediately start re-writing the sentences in my head, I will probably give it a go.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment