Probably everyone here is aware of the discussion going on all over about a recent discussion of the "best" works of SF, and how few women were mentioned.
la_marquise_de began a list of women writers whose works she felt should be represented on that list, and encouraged others to do so
(
Read more... )
Comments 37
And yes, why is the important question. The list is just a conversation opener. I want to hear about books. Everyone is welcome to stop by and join in.
Reply
I did appreciate how it sparked interest in history, and reaffirmed female agency for readers, which was why I recommended it, even though I personally found myself skimming great portions in exasperation.
Reply
However, I can see why it was an important book in fantasy.
Reply
Reply
Hey, sartorias, ever read Paper Moon by Joe David Brown? It was made into a movie, which I haven't seen, but I can't imagine it could be better than the book. Not a SF/F work, but I think you'd like it if you haven't read it.
Reply
I really should read Paper Moon--at the time the movie came out, I was so repelled by Tatum O'Neal's character (felt that she wasn't like a real kid at all, but another of those precious fast-talking mini adults in the form of a kid that were popular around then) that I never looked at it again or sought the book. But enough time has gone by that I really should revisit the film, and read the book.
Reply
Did you ever read Sarah Dunant's historicals? I think I recommended them to you a while back, but you said they'd have to go under a tall pile of books you meant to read first.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
The trade paperback is published by Del Rey now, but the Knopf hc was a big, big deal at the time.
Reply
Reply
It wasn't meant to be a "you're wrong!" correction, though -- sorry if I came across that way =/. She did submit to Lester; he thought it was general interest enough for Knopf. I think I read somewhere that this made her enormously nervous, because she did get a lot of ink at that time as well.
But I honestly think that had it not been published by Knopf, had it been published by Del Rey, it wouldn't have had nearly the influence it did, because it wouldn't have gotten the press, or the general readership, Knopf could bring.
I think things are different, now, because, well, 1983. (Also? Wikipedia is wrong, but if you Google, you'll find a couple of solid "all editions" pub pages). I was working in a chain bookstore at the time; I remember the first edition *wry g*.)
Reply
I don't mind corrections a bit. My memory is image based, and I know it isn't to be trusted.
Reply
I suspect that some of those clinkers-loved-by-others ended up on the list from a desire to include the author rather than that specific work. For example, I don't think DOG WIZARD is by any stretch Barbara Hambly's best or most influential fantasy. (DRAGONSBANE would be my candidate, but I'd also argue for THE LADIES OF MANDRIGYN or several others, not to mention BRIDE OF THE RAT GOD.) What the lister and I agree on is that Hambly belongs on the list of wonderful (and underrated) women fantasy writers.
Reply
Leave a comment