Pudsey fev-ah

Nov 17, 2006 19:43

I said it last year and I'll say it again this year, Children In Need is not the same without Gaby Roslin. Mostly because I don't like either Fearne Cotton or Natasha Kaplinski. The word, my dears, is patronising ( Read more... )

charity, tv makes my soul weep / laugh / sigh

Leave a comment

Comments 5

sparkly_faerie November 17 2006, 19:48:14 UTC
LOLZ.
Yes, I can see it affects your ability to spell :p

I don't like Children In Need, it's always seemed a bit ... well ... crappy. *Ducks*
I never manage to see the good bits but always catch the rubbish filler ... like bits with local newsreaders in Bristol :/

Reply

samincittagazze November 17 2006, 20:06:55 UTC
I can't spell at the best of times, and at the moment my brain cell is fried. :P

Ah my dear, you're missing the point. Children in Need is good because it's so crappy. It's worth sitting through the rubbishy filler bits to see z-list celebs being cheered for doing the most hilarously embarrassing things.

Reply


splodge04 November 17 2006, 20:55:59 UTC
omg, i totally agree about the gaby thing, she had the chemistry. I havent watched much as i just got in from work :(

Reply

samincittagazze November 17 2006, 20:58:53 UTC
Don't worry, so far it's been crap, and not funny crap. I admit it, I'm waiting for Connie and the kids from the Sound of Music. I'm sad, I don't care. ;)

Reply

splodge04 November 17 2006, 21:02:37 UTC
lol you're not sad. i usually watch it but my head hurts soo bad. im kinda half dozing and checking mail :P

Reply


Leave a comment

Up