I said it last year and I'll say it again this year, Children In Need is not the same without Gaby Roslin. Mostly because I don't like either Fearne Cotton or Natasha Kaplinski. The word, my dears, is patronising
( Read more... )
LOLZ. Yes, I can see it affects your ability to spell :p
I don't like Children In Need, it's always seemed a bit ... well ... crappy. *Ducks* I never manage to see the good bits but always catch the rubbish filler ... like bits with local newsreaders in Bristol :/
I can't spell at the best of times, and at the moment my brain cell is fried. :P
Ah my dear, you're missing the point. Children in Need is good because it's so crappy. It's worth sitting through the rubbishy filler bits to see z-list celebs being cheered for doing the most hilarously embarrassing things.
Don't worry, so far it's been crap, and not funny crap. I admit it, I'm waiting for Connie and the kids from the Sound of Music. I'm sad, I don't care. ;)
Comments 5
Yes, I can see it affects your ability to spell :p
I don't like Children In Need, it's always seemed a bit ... well ... crappy. *Ducks*
I never manage to see the good bits but always catch the rubbish filler ... like bits with local newsreaders in Bristol :/
Reply
Ah my dear, you're missing the point. Children in Need is good because it's so crappy. It's worth sitting through the rubbishy filler bits to see z-list celebs being cheered for doing the most hilarously embarrassing things.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment