Asking: On the Topic of Fannish Discussions

Jun 22, 2010 07:47

I have to admit that I haven't paid a lot of attention to varying fails and other large fannish discussions. I do hear about them sometimes, mostly from norwich36 and hederahelix. In some post or comment about one of the recent ones, someone (I know, I know; I should cite my sources, but it was not where I thought it was and now I can't remember where it really did ( Read more... )

fans and fandom, asking, politics, life on lj

Leave a comment

Comments 6

norwich36 June 22 2010, 16:24:17 UTC
I think it is now acceptable to point out politically problematic things, but people still get upset if you post other types of criticism (e.g. your plot had serious problems, your characterization was very OOC, etc.) Actually, people get upset when you point out politically problematic things too--it's just that there's a new consensus that trying to silence that form of criticism is wrong.

Still, if you are going to post about problematic elements in stories, I think it's better to do it in your own LJ than as a comment to the author.

I think you might experience the wrath of fandom if you posted on endings using specific examples, but maybe not. My own bigbang reviews this year have contained a number of critical comments and haven't created a wankstorm--at least not yet. (Though that racefail story seemed to have killed my snark. I find myself thinking "ok, all the characters were completely OOC and the plot sucked monkey balls, but at least it didn't exploit a RL tragedy for porn.")

Reply

rsadelle June 23 2010, 14:44:55 UTC
I don't want to comment to the author, so I like it that your advice is to just post it here.

One of my thoughts about using examples is that not enough people in the larger world of bandom pay attention to me for anyone to notice/get upset with me.

Reply


megyal June 22 2010, 23:07:09 UTC
I think you always run the risk of getting yelled/shunned at/called evil by at least one person, probably the writer, no matter what the problematic thing is. I guess it's up to you to know when to make a comment, because a comment may feed a wank, turning it into a verbal twister on the level of F5. You'll come back to your email with a look of confusion on your face.

What do you mean by endings seem to be harder than I ever imagine? Maybe it would be odd to use current examples. But it all depends on how you present it, I guess?

Reply

rsadelle June 23 2010, 14:48:34 UTC
I suppose that's true. I'm kind of thinking that few enough people from bandom as a whole pay attention to me that if I say something it won't be a huge thing where I get yelled at.

I have never thought endings were all that hard to write, but in the last couple of weeks, I've read a lot of stories with endings that don't work for one reason or another. Many of them are abrupt, which I'm starting to think might be an effect of big bang - people rush to finish the story before the deadline.

Reply


icanbreakthesky June 23 2010, 23:35:49 UTC
Even if you didn't mean anything by it, you could hurt someone's feelings if they found out about it--it doesn't really matter how few people pay attention to you, if there's one person who will take it the wrong way scrolling through your flist. Just because people don't have you friended doesn't mean they aren't reading you, apparently (a post I made in my journal after Bob left MCR got linked to wank_report, and god knows I didn't think anyone was paying attention to me). If you did specific examples it could still get around very fast. I guess it depends on how you do it ( ... )

Reply

rsadelle June 26 2010, 01:44:40 UTC
I think you're right - I honestly was thinking more of my own annoyance with writing that doesn't work and not about the people behind the fic, which is not really in accordance with how I want to live my life. Thank you for the reminder.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up