A NEW RULE APPEARS

[these_balls]

Hey, Route!

Yes, more new stuff. Everything chaaanges, chaaaanges, it's evolutionary~

Comments

[bakuhadera]

How is linking apps considered negative? Just asking out of general curiosity here because any time I've ever modded a game, I've opened tabs to each application I had to read and then went through them like a check list. Having an app all in one place doesn't seem any different than opening a tab to those app comments to me. But I am sorry I caused an inconvenience with mine when I did that. I just saw it as a chance, as an apper, to not have to worry about character limits in my comments. It's the single-most annoying thing I've ever found about doing an app in the first place

[these_balls]

It isn't negative! Or at least, it would definitely be less noticeable for us, if say, Route got somewhere around 10-15 apps a week. But Route gets, on average, about 25 apps per app round, sometimes more, sometimes less, but at least 20

[fullmetalbro]

I personally have no preference to the password system. I really don't care if it is changed or not, so long as the final verdict is posted.

[these_balls]

The verdict would definitely be posted, don't worry about that!

[papas_bunnydoll]

if your app is linked but not marked for spoilers, it will not be processed that week

If I read that right, you just have to put up that there are spoilers in your ap so you can link it...which means that anything that could be a spoiler for a canon (and yes some older canons still have considered spoilers; for example: there is a character who's background in Weiss is not known by everyone and it would be a major issue to someone who is watching or wanting to watch w/out knowing this) would make it possible for you to link your ap.

[these_balls]

Well, we ask for our players to use common sense with this, like in all things; we ask that only big spoilers be placed under a link. What defines a 'big' spoiler might be up for interpretation, but if we see a lot of abuse, we'll crack down.