Spider-Man 2: oversight or genius?

May 10, 2014 01:20

it was a reasonably good film. I've heard that there are scenes not advisable for those with epilepsy ( Read more... )

movie, reviews, spoilers, spider-man

Leave a comment

Comments 2

lil_shepherd May 10 2014, 06:03:34 UTC
I haven't seen this movie (and have no intention of doing so, as I disliked the first one very much.) I may be misreading you, but are they by any chance suggesting that the spider-venom has a DNA component? Cos it doesn't. Nor does it have a genetic effect - it's a neurotoxin. I think Stan's radioactive spider probably made more sense!

Reply

rodlox May 10 2014, 06:45:39 UTC
quite right: spiders need their venom to process their food for them. (or real spiders do)

I have no idea how those film spiders eat - both transformations were as a result of being injected with the hybrid venom (with human DNA in it)
I suppose they - the scriptwriters - heard that spider fangs are like hypodermic needles...and proved "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing" right in spades.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up