Writing

Oct 23, 2008 17:38

If you could design your writing system (let's say for writing English to keep things simple), what would it be like?

I suspect everyone reading this will be most familiar with the Latin alphabet, as is standardly used to write English. But this script wasn't developed for English, as I'm sure you know - it came from Phoenician, via Greek (through ( Read more... )

script, scripts, writing, english, language

Leave a comment

Comments 19

woodpijn October 23 2008, 17:05:28 UTC
Interesting. I guess it would be as close as possible to a one-to-one mapping between phonemes and symbols, and it wouldn't have any letters that were too similar and easy to mix up, and it would be pretty and conducive to calligraphy.

Reply

rochvelleth October 24 2008, 17:41:47 UTC
Ooh, it's lovely to see people mentioning the phonemic principle! We do an essay for Classics first years that asks whether the Greek and Latin alphabets are good scripts, and every year the answers were so unpredictable that we added a hint about finding out whether they adhere to the phonemic principle or not :)

When you say conducive to calligraphy, are you thinking of writing in ink on paper? Or just generally, including things like stone inscriptions? I hadn't really thought about how pretty I want my ideal script to be, so I'm interested now.

Reply

woodpijn October 24 2008, 18:07:44 UTC
I did only have ink and paper in mind. I have a vague concept of what would be conducive to ink calligraphy - curves rather than angles, letters that can flow into the next letter, etc - but I don't have any concept of what, if anything, would make it easier to carve letters prettily in stone.

Reply


vyvyan October 23 2008, 17:41:55 UTC
I'd like to see all languages written in the IPA, reflecting each speaker's pronunciation :-)

Reply

rochvelleth October 24 2008, 17:38:26 UTC
Now that's quite controversial! :)

Reply


enismirdal October 23 2008, 17:42:33 UTC
I think I'd go for something like Katakana, where syllables are represented rather than individual letters, but it would probably need a fairly complicated system of accents and stuff to make sure foreign loan-words and what not are rendered suitably. Perhaps using a Tengwar-like style of swirly bits cos it's pretty. (There's some really ancient script I've come across in encylopaedias and stuff and every time I see it I just think, "Wow. That is SO beautiful." But I can never remember for the life of me what it's called. It might start with O but I might be imagining that.)

Or something 100% phonetic. But prettier than the current phonetic alphabet. Something where even my worst undergraduates couldn't make any spelling mistakes, now that would be nice!

Reply

rochvelleth October 24 2008, 17:44:15 UTC
Wow, we have a vote for a syllabic script! I wasn't expecting that :) But then I'm feeling less and less friendly towards the syllabic script(s) I'm working with at the moment!

Ooh, I wonder what ancient script you mean... Do you remember where abouts it comes from?

Something where even my worst undergraduates couldn't make any spelling mistakes, now that would be nice!

Ah, I'm with you there! :)

Reply

enismirdal October 24 2008, 23:00:28 UTC
It would increase typing speeds, I think, once you learned the layout of the keyboard - a word could be, like, 3 keys instead of 6. :D

Hmm...I'm not sure exactly where. I'd guess somewhere not too far from the Middle-East - no further east than the middle of India and no further west than the Balkans. I don't think it was anything Native American or anything like that - it was a pretty swirly, curly thing not too dissimilar to stuff like Kannada and Glagolitic and that sort of thing.

Reply


Saluton. Ĉu vi parolas Esperanton? ex_robhu October 23 2008, 19:57:15 UTC
A formal grammar? Something like Lisp's S-expressions?

P.S. I'm ignoring your original question and answering the question I wish you'd asked. I find running my life in this way makes me happier.

Reply

Re: Saluton. Ĉu vi parolas Esperanton? rochvelleth October 24 2008, 17:46:06 UTC
You did indeed ignore my question spectacularly well :)

But I can forgive you, since you have interesting links ;) Not that I can get my head around them at the moment, because my brain has turned to mush, but I'll have another look when I'm less mushy!

Reply

Re: Saluton. Ĉu vi parolas Esperanton? rochvelleth October 24 2008, 17:48:26 UTC
P.S. Just scanned through the first link with a blank mind and managed to read 'Chomsky-free grammars' in it :)

Reply


epea_pteroenta October 23 2008, 22:17:09 UTC
I really want to think about this and answer it in an interesting way- but I have to prepare for two supervisions by tomorrow so I'm not going to! :(

Reply

rochvelleth October 24 2008, 17:47:18 UTC
Oh don't worry, I understand! Feel free to come back to it if you have spare time to think about the question :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up