I'm not 100% sure I agree with the broadening of the term 'prostitute' to include ALL of the above behaviors, but I certainly agree with the conclusion and overall sentiment. All of the behaviors mentioned devalue love-making, and really should be avoided.
The behavior is not the issue. The issue is intent.
For example, a gal goes on a date with a guy. He takes her to a very nice restaurant and to opening night of a well reviewed play. The guy is a bit of a sad sack nebbish. She doesn't really like the guy, but decides to sleep with him - but NOT because he spent money on her, but because out of pity. That is not prostitution.
The difference is in the INTENT. If she slept with him BECAUSE he spent money on her, then she's a prostitute.
Clarity of intent might be hard to prove (or know for certain). I think most people rarely do anything for exactly one well defined purpose, and women choosing to have sex with someone especially is a choice that includes many thoughts. If a woman definitely was only thinking about liquid assets, goods, and services as a reason to do it, yes, no question you are right.
Comments 3
Reply
For example, a gal goes on a date with a guy. He takes her to a very nice restaurant and to opening night of a well reviewed play. The guy is a bit of a sad sack nebbish. She doesn't really like the guy, but decides to sleep with him - but NOT because he spent money on her, but because out of pity. That is not prostitution.
The difference is in the INTENT. If she slept with him BECAUSE he spent money on her, then she's a prostitute.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment