Leave a comment

Comments 16

brown_betty April 28 2006, 06:46:47 UTC
Oooh, shiny. I went to look up Don Newton when adding tags.

Places you do not expect to find “the neutrality of this article is disputed:” A wikipedia article on a batman penciller.

Where you begin to think it may be merited: "The Newton Batman harkened back to the days of Dick Sprang; it was a majestic thing of beauty. … Under Don’s inspired pencils they breathed real breath; they became real people. This was Don’s talent; this is what set him apart from every other penciler."

Um, okay!

Although I will admit his pencils are lovely. I like the roguish eyebrow on Dick, and the way everyone's shoulders work together to focus the scene on Dick and Gordon. Nice.

Reply

sharpest_rose April 28 2006, 07:05:27 UTC
I'm sensing a vague fondness for Don Newton by that Wiki contributor, somehow.

This was a really pretty era for the Bat-books. With the original post-Crisis Jason run of a few years later, most of my love for the characters comes from the (usually cracked-out, and not the good sort of cracked-out) writing, as a lot of the art is kind of slipshod. But the pre-Crisis artwork is a really nice match to the story style.

Reply


chameleongirl79 April 28 2006, 07:25:23 UTC
hehehe. I *finally* finished reading all the pre-Crisis Jason isues that I snagged from you about a week ago.

That kid was made of love and sparkles and just a little bit of scary.

Reply


jemppu April 28 2006, 08:53:05 UTC
And minutes later Jason Todd looks great
:D Becoming Robin generally 'causes such effects.

The correct issue number however should probably be #368 (though issue #638 was an important Jason issue too. That's funny.)

Reply

sharpest_rose April 28 2006, 21:43:16 UTC
AHAHA WHUPS. Er, yes, the issue isn't about Red Hood and Batman punching each other a lot, is it? I'm tempted to leave it the way it is, just because.

Reply


janegray April 28 2006, 09:05:44 UTC
"The Flying Todds". Deja vu = fancy way to say rip off.

Reply


chalcopyrite April 28 2006, 10:26:16 UTC
Ooh. Thanks for posting this.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up