. . . also . . .

Feb 11, 2012 11:01

My mother was right. VIlna (Vilnius to you) was in fact in Poland at the time that my grandparents emigrated. Which means that it was officially Wilnow. Historical atlases put it in Russia.  I realize that both could be true, but if my mother was right about that, maybe she was right about the story of my grandmother and the Cossacks?

history is a terrible thing, family, my research let me show you it, vilna, not-poland

Leave a comment

Comments 6

shana February 11 2012, 19:13:00 UTC
I found out by checking the Columbia Gazetteer of the World that the village my grandmother came from, which was then in Austria-Hungary, is now located in the Ukraine.

Reply

ritaxis February 11 2012, 20:18:38 UTC
Yes, in the nice fellow's family that happened too. The family thought that they were Germans from Hungary, but the village is in Serbia now.

Reply


kate_schaefer February 11 2012, 19:16:06 UTC
But, but, but -- no matter whether Poland or Russia was the conqueror-in-residence at the time, Vilna/Vilnius/Wilnow would still be in Lithuania.

Which has no bearing on the story about your grandmother and the Cossacks.

Reply

ritaxis February 11 2012, 20:17:42 UTC
It depends on who's talking. Lithuania, even as a concept, has grown and shrunk over the centuries. I don't actually know if Vilna(etc) is in the core territory that was the earliest Lithuania. I should look it up sometime when I should be doing something else.

Reply


madwriter February 12 2012, 23:50:49 UTC
With Poland it's hard to tell. So much of the country was ruled by Russia so often--or at least was recognized as Russian by Western powers of the time, true in practice or not--that it could practically all be true simultaneously.

Reply

ritaxis February 13 2012, 01:57:41 UTC
Yes, that's what I think. Historical atlases have a hard time expressing that, though.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up