Leave a comment

Comments 3

cottonmanifesto February 22 2007, 12:57:07 UTC
that guy really likes his job!

Reply


kip_w February 22 2007, 19:28:38 UTC
I find that reducing things about 50% at a time, and sharpening a little between times, keeps the detail intact at smaller sizes. Reducing all at once means the algorithm decides what stays in.

I don't even know if that's what you aren't liking, but it's offered just in case.

Reply

ritaxis February 22 2007, 22:50:55 UTC
I think you're responding to what I'm not liking. I wonder what would happen if I used even smaller increments?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up