There are only three episodes of 10 O'Clock Live left! I'm going to miss it when it finishes, even though it doesn't have nearly enough interaction between the presenters. It was very wobbly indeed when it started out, but I think it's really found its feet, and the past few episodes have been great.
The problem with 10 O'Clock Live is that it
(
Read more... )
Comments 15
'On Tuesday [Sienna Miller]'s prancing around in front of a camera; why on Wednesday should she complain about it because she happens to get caught by a pap who's maybe listened in to her messages to see where she's gonna go?' THIS IS A VERBATIM QUOTE. If you're happy being in front of a camera on your own terms, what right do you have to complain when people listen in on your private conversations?
What the fuck is wrong with some people? Seriously? There is a difference between doing things with a person who is a willing participant, and doing things to a person against their will. The first is generally okay, and the second is generally not (with certain narrow exceptions, like shoving someone out of the street so they won't get hit by that oncoming car they didn't know about). That's a basic ethical principle that should really be learned by anyone who's going to interact with other people in any way. It's right up there with ( ... )
Reply
Every word that came out of that man's mouth was appalling nonsense. The audience ended up making pantomime booing noises. He tried to defend phone hacking by saying that the electorate had a right to know what the people they might be voting into power were up to; Mitchell pointed out that a) politicians' private lives were largely irrelevant, and b) that really wasn't a defence one could use when tapping into the phones of, say, actors.
(A classic News of the World front-page headline, incidentally: F1 BOSS HAS SICK NAZI ORGY WITH 5 HOOKERS. I don't know about you, but I think this sounds exactly the place to go for cracking investigative journalism.)
Reply
Yeah, that's an incredibly transparent after-the-fact justification. Digging through the privacy of every famous person just in case some of the ones who are politicians are discussing anything relevant? Ick. I mean if you installed spy cameras in their bathrooms, there's a microscopic chance that you'd learn something relevant, too!
Reply
Is like Newsnight being live, or Question Time being recorded only so far in advance (couple of hours, I believe, though I do remember nights that's gone out live) so they can take out the swears and any majorly stupid questions.
I'm going to miss 10 o'clock live when it finishes too. Where else will I be able to get Brooker and Mitchell staring at each other and ignoring everyone else in the room?
Reply
Where else will I be able to get Brooker and Mitchell staring at each other and ignoring everyone else in the room?
I love the moments when it's just Brooker and Mitchell in shot, chatting away. Well done, whoever decided that they should always sit next to each other at the discussiony bits. (You'll get Brooker ignoring everyone but Mitchell when the Wallace-Havers-Wadia-Brooker episode of Would I Lie to You? is broadcast, at least?)
Reply
Reply
Reply
(In the audience's defence: they are a bit drunk, and the tension of it being live affects them too, and they get coaxed to be louder at every ad break. True fact.)
Completely agree re: Prescott vs NOTWA. And apparently he got props for it afterwards. :)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment