I am supposed to be reading the 1799 Prelude and one of its later (and much, much longer) revisions this week. I have been neglecting this somewhat, because dude, three essays, The Prelude can wait (NO, OBVIOUSLY UPDATING MY LIVEJOURNAL CANNOT, ahahaha oh dear I'm such a bad student), but I found this part at the beginning of the 1799 version and
(
Read more... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
I have no idea what James May would be like as two women, for some reason. And I find the mental picture of even one female Jeremy Clarkson somewhat alarming (and gigantic; my brain refuses to shorten her); two would have me diving for a blast-shield.
Reply
I saw a comment on nostalgia_lj's LJ that says you do!
Reply
Besides, it wasn't porn. It was a description of a woman's head with a brief and discreet mention of her chest. No porn-associated body parts were named, no other people were mentioned, and no sexual acts were specified.
Reply
Leave a comment