Why???

Nov 09, 2012 16:24

I almost always assume that when someone unburdens themselves at me, particularly when the situation has nothing to do with me and said person appears to have no reason to share, they are telling the truth.

This fact is reason #3829101 that if I am not completely stupid, I am at least naive.

Leave a comment

Comments 9

eqfe November 10 2012, 00:47:40 UTC
74

Reply

rightnow November 10 2012, 03:40:30 UTC
?

11?

Reply


eqfe November 10 2012, 11:56:53 UTC
I had earlier posted that you are a lot of things but stupid isn't one of them. I didn't see that so I was testing to see if comments were screened, and then I got distracted by work.

Reply


evilsausage November 10 2012, 15:23:08 UTC
42.

Reply

rightnow November 10 2012, 19:06:20 UTC
42 is a lie.

Reply


lucidpsychogod November 12 2012, 14:25:19 UTC
WHOA! YOU ARE COMPARING STUPID TO NAIVE! let's break things into pieces ( ... )

Reply

rightnow November 12 2012, 18:54:51 UTC
I just reduced all this to its simplest terms, while you spent five minutes conveying a simple thought. Some of it made me laugh, some of it made me summarize to 'blahblahblah', others of it made me wonder if you're actually a chick.

Reply

lucidpsychogod November 12 2012, 19:16:19 UTC
i'm a rooster on the chinese sorcery clock, means my ideas are in chick format, whether hen or rooster, they usually aren't worth a buck? and since fouls sputter wild ungulates?

Reply

rightnow November 12 2012, 19:59:20 UTC
I'm a tiger. Tigers eat roosters for dinner. Or they would, if roosters ever wandered through the jungle. Then again, tigers are an endangered species, so maybe I'll starve to death.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up