Parts
one and
two here.
Reading these two parts of the liveblogging, and then the *comments*, goodness the comments. It's making me want to cry.
Dr. Ilan H. Meyer, Associate Professor of Clinical Sociomedical Sciences at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health is up. He will testify about the stigma and prejudice gay and lesbians
(
Read more... )
Comments 3
And can I say how much Dr. Meyer is becoming my hero? He's so amazing in his clear answers to difficult questions, and I wanted to cheer every time he countered the defense's attempts to oversimplify with a clear but nuanced response which somehow through into stark relief just how manipulative the defense's wording was attempting to be. Yay for clearly pointing out disingenuous questioning \o/
And I agree--the commenters are really effective in modeling actual conversation and debate in a respectful way which never gets away from the sheer human impact and stakes of the trial. I'm so glad that this exists, even if I think the legal arguments for the lack of cameras are . . . shall we say, problematic, flimsy and ill-advised? Also, a terrible precedent.
Reply
I was reading through some other peoples' analyses, and the lack of cameras thing apparently has legal precedent. And some the people currently on the Supreme Court have heebie-jeebies about cameras. But I definitely think it's a bad idea, because this is freaking homosexuality on trial here, and having the witnesses like Helen Zia being on camera for people to see would put a human face on this case. Which, yanno, pro-8 side doesn't want. Dur ( ... )
Reply
But yeah, I totally didn't expect the level of civility I saw in the comments because, I generally find this to be true ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment