Feb 05, 2005 12:22
1. Do you believe that Creationism or Intelligent Design should be required material in public schools? Why or why not?
2. Do you believe that Evolution should continue to be taught in public schools, even though it directly conflicts with the story of Genesis? Why or why not?
Leave a comment
Comments 4
(The comment has been removed)
And I love how Neocreationists are taking advantage of the public's ignorance of the word "theory" when applied to science. "Evolution is just a theory, it has yet to be proven..etc etc." Yikes.
Reply
Reply
Intelligent design is sort of Neocreationist theory which states that a higher being was responsible for creating all of the life forms on Earth. They do not necessarily believe in the literal interpretation of the Bible and Genesis. One of their main arguments against Evolution is that complex organs such as the eye could not have developed via natural selection and small, random mutations, as stated in Darwin's theory. Consequently, proponents of ID believe that a designer must have preconceived these complex functions.
Here's a link, and although it is quite biased, it gives an overview of ID: http://www.csicop.org/si/2001-09/design.html
I would find you something less biased but most of my research has been done with books, so I have yet to find a very neutral internet source.
Reply
2. yes. evolution is a valid theory with a decent amount of information supporting it. it may conflict with the story of Genesis, but Genesis is a religious belief, which again should not be taught in public schools.
Reply
Leave a comment