I was just glancing through Netflix to see if my next Five story, Snakedance, was available for instant streaming (which it's not), and came across this review for New Who. Basically, they tell the prospective watcher to only see the best episodes to start with, all but two I agreed with (there's were Blink, Midnight, The Silence in the Library/The
(
Read more... )
Comments 25
And, yeah, it's MUCH better when you watch it in order. Rose may have been a bit cheesey and silly as a series opener, but it did a great job of connecting the viewer to character and somewhat to continuity (at least at a starting place), and it had the "turning of the earth" speech, which is really what hooked me on the series and the character of the Doctor.
Reply
Exactly. It was designed specifically for an introduction to a viewer who may or may not be familiar with the series. Really, any season opener/special is going to be geared towards a newbie, but Rose more so than any others.
Reply
When I saw my first Who ep, PiC, I had to ask my old friend, who had seen some Doctor Who (but hasn't finished even Series 4 yet), what the hell a TARDIS was or that screwdriver thingy he had. And, who is the Doctor anyway?! Even that series opener wasn't that friendly to new fans, imho.
Seriously, those were my questions. I had no clue where I was. I think my next episode was Midnight...yup, was I confused!
Reply
But we had a DVR subscription to the series, so s2-4 repeats started recording around the same time that s5 was ending. My first RTD era episode was The Idiot's Lantern lol ... what struck me about it was that the dialogue/character attitude/something about the way the characters were presented made it really clear to me that the BBC fully expected the audience to care about these characters. That intrigued me, so I kept watching and eventually backtracked to watch everything else too! =)
Reply
Gimme a break.
Reply
Oh yeah, and some token other episodes just to try to demonstrate I have varied tastes.
LOL. Yup, pretty much. "I swear I'm not biased!" Although I should probably have that disclaimer on my forehead as well...along with every other Whovian with their own Doctor. *shrug*
Reply
... lol I dun wanna be fair!!! XD
(kidding, kidding ... kinda lol)
It's just whenever I see all of Moffat's episodes on a must-see list, the poster invariably is a huge Moffat stan. Part of this means that they believe plot/concept >>> characterization/emotional arcs (which I think goes hand in hand with your complaint about them saying people don't need to watch the eps in order. If one cares about characterization arcs at all, this is an absurd statement to make - but it proves my point about the type of fan this probably is). I just find it highly annoying.
But yes, Midnight is brilliant - and it plays directly into Ten's hubristic character arc, which is one of many reasons it works so well.
Reply
I understand the appeal of a plot/concept focused story but when you have whole series of it, like what Moffat is doing right now, I get bored. Really, really bored. What first struck me in the series was the emotional development and attachment the characters had towards each other, either companion to Doctor or Doctor to companion, even Doctor to the nameless girl in Midnight. It was all there and I loved it, and RTD, for making a show like that. Call it a soap opera if you want but I will stand by what I know and love. *makes a stand* (Oh, I'm still sitting, but that's not the point! lol)
But yes, Midnight is brilliant - and it plays directly into Ten's hubristic character arc, which is one of many reasons it works so well.I've never really understood Midnight, and never thought of Ten's hubris arc coming into play on this ep (more his fun, I will save everyone type of thing, and his declining faith not only in himself but in others as well), so obviously a ( ... )
Reply
When I tell people to watch it, I tell them to start with "Rose." It was custom-made for people who aren't already familiar with the show. It's an easy introduction and a fun ep to boot.
Reply
Reply
"Rose" was pretty much made for the new viewer, particularly considering that the main demographic most companies are looking for are the twenty-somethings who, if they were lucky, knew of the Movie. RTD truly was aiming for a brand-new audience and, really, without him we might never have seen DW grace our screens again. I believe Moffat tried after the weird comedy thing he did (forgot the name of it, I just know it had the twelfth Doctor in it) but nobody wanted it then.
Right now, I'd say either "Rose" or, if they wanted more action, "The Eleventh Hour," which also, in a way, re-defined the series. Both are god stepping stones, depending upon the viewer and what they are looking for.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I've always started people off with "The End of the World". I like it's mix of drama and cheese.
Reply
You are no fan!!!!! /sarcasm (What BS that whole thing was.)
You start off people with EotW instead of just Rose? That's different. I always felt like Rose was a needed episode, if only for the introduction to the Doctor than anything else.
Reply
Reply
I'll admit that I tried to do that but was too damned confused that I went back to the beginning. At least now I can just watch all the Ten I want without having to do the prerequisite course. lol
Reply
Leave a comment