(Untitled)

Oct 02, 2008 13:04

Do you think Katie Couric has any personal feelings of animosity against Palin at this point? Like, does she get up in the morning thinking "damn, I have to interview that f***ing moron from Alaska again today"? I absolutely love that she pins the chick down on specifics (or tries to, since Palin can't actually say anything specific ever), but I ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 5

miraclaire October 2 2008, 17:23:41 UTC
It seemed to me that Katie Couric was trying to be as kind/gentle as possible, but that the extent of Palin's inability to form a coherent thought or say anything that is in any way meaningful was just too much.

Reply

redcat9 October 2 2008, 21:30:03 UTC
That's the vibe I got too, but I'm wondering if that's not what people on the other side of the political spectrum see?

Reply

liquidsnake October 3 2008, 00:02:15 UTC
They see it as highly adversarial, no question. Where we see forgiving attempts to re-ask a easy question in the hopes of getting an responsive reply with some content, they see unfair hounding and ambushes.

Reply

nomeda_g October 4 2008, 04:13:32 UTC
i know someone who is very pro-McCain and pro-Palin i can say they do indeed view it as an attack. this person feels that the media should be helping her and not hurting her. i don't really get how you can be pro-Palin at this point...

Reply


selinker October 2 2008, 23:39:46 UTC
Palin saved Couric. The talk about Couric was that she was soft-willed, lacking in experience, and out of her element with hard news-exactly the criticism of Palin. So Couric seized upon the opportunity to enhance her standing at the expense of a fellow woman in a man's world. Now Couric is a champion of truth, and Palin is, through her own efforts, a moron. It could not have turned out better for Couric.

Which sounds awful, but in fact turned out to be entirely awesome for everyone. (Except Palin.)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up