Oh goody, goody, there's another Teaparty rally in DC this weekend. At least they have been advised to
stay off the green and yellow lines, which I guess means they won't be around my neighborhood. (
there is also this handy map). Maybe it will at least be entertaining after the fact again. My favorite part about the last rally was the irony of
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
(Whenever I think of KISS I think of this one interview where they were geeking out over the fact that their logo was hand-drawn so one of the S's is shorter than the other. I think that makes it hard for me to think of them as terribly hardcore anyway.)
Reply
I think that's true, but I think the fact that it *isn't* questioned is also important. The other point that 'Night made was, that if you reduce their stage show to just the functional elements, what is the *functional* difference between KISS and, say, Adam Lambert? That kind of dominant machismo becomes threatening when it is unapologetically queer, and probably threatening even if it potentially queer.
I know very little about the band themselves, so I'm speaking less of them as a band and more of how they are read in the dominant culture. It seems to be that there was something consciously kitsch about their performance, but that was just my perception and I don't know if that's true.
Also, I have had a lot of beer right now, so I'm hoping I'm making sense. :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
(Yay family?!?! I'm excited.)
Reply
My older daughter's friend thinks KISS stands for Knights in Satan's Service. She also isn't allowed to sleep over because I write about vampires. KISS actually stands for Keep it Simple Stupid, meaning they wanted to keep their music simple, which they did.
I don't think KISS depends on masculinity. Judas Priest's Rob Halford came out of the closet awhile ago and it effected them zilch. KISS's draw is it's very ritualistic and encourages a sub-culture (the KISS Army).
Reply
Leave a comment