Silencing dissent

Aug 08, 2009 14:01

NY Times uses lame excuse to fire Ben Stein.

The real reason, of course, is that Stein opposes the Obamanation.

Read more... )

hypocrisy, free speech, ben stein, new york times

Leave a comment

Comments 6

cdat1ad August 8 2009, 23:59:19 UTC
Sadly this is to be most dissenters fate. Never realizing the backlash thier administration will face when it has to step down. I feel treason charges are well deserved. More power to you though, as you are still willing to debate leftie idiots. Myself, I am already at the cartridge box stage, and am just waiting for orders.

Reply

reality_hammer August 9 2009, 00:38:22 UTC
There's always hope that many Democrats will see the light and switch parties, like they did in the 1980s!

Reply

schpydurx August 9 2009, 21:58:22 UTC
but if these Democrats turn into RINOs, what's the point?

Reply

reality_hammer August 10 2009, 20:33:43 UTC
IMO the RINOs came later, when it was obvious the GOP was going to maintain a majority for a few years.

Reply


schpydurx August 9 2009, 21:49:11 UTC
What a bunch of bullshit.

Reply


winnowill2 August 10 2009, 17:24:16 UTC
And this leaves them with...Krugman?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up