Hezbollah abuses civilians

Jul 31, 2006 22:07

Let's be clear about this. No photo-"journalist" is going to whitewash the issue because he "can't see" Hezbollah doing it.

Look: musical bodies.

That's what Hezbollah does.

We have evidence they used the UN and civilians as a shield yet you want to take the word of a photo-"journalist" spouting pro-Hezbollah propaganda in Salon that they don't ( Read more... )

fascism, hezbollah, useful fools

Leave a comment

Comments 8

allykatt August 1 2006, 02:50:17 UTC
i would also like someone to define "civilian" when dealing with a plain-clothes terrorist organization?

NON-UNIFORMED?
NON-MILITARY?

what defines it, for god's sake???

Reply


hollie_is_right August 1 2006, 03:08:42 UTC
And people are still practically blaming Israel. Even O'Reilly is yammering...."Shouldn't Israel hold higher standards...." Blah, blah, blah. Talking about Qana. Whatever.

Reply


felinoid August 1 2006, 13:58:11 UTC
Anyone carrying a weapon.

Of course once the person is a dead body just seperate the weapon from the body and instant civilian.

I'm going to wonder if the civilians were actually civilians given there is no way to know.

As for the media attatude. All I can say is put presure on a certen opinion and it is hard to even think about expressing any other opinion.
At work I have people try that often enough I can see it.
(however here they jumped right into the outragous)

Reply


puppet_of_god August 1 2006, 14:44:58 UTC
I think I speak for everyone when I say stop making sense.

kthxbye.

Reply


moonchylde August 2 2006, 17:52:53 UTC
I think the actual phrase you might be looking for is, "More susceptable to propaganda from one side than the other."

Which pretty much applies across the board.

Both sides suck in this conflict.

Reply

reality_hammer August 3 2006, 00:51:14 UTC
I disagree. I support Israel. They are not deliberating targeting civilians and they did not cross an national boundry to attack/kidnap people (an act of war).

Reply


Leave a comment

Up