How the left lies

Aug 20, 2005 01:55

Two examples of blatant lying from the left.

First, there is (former Enron advisor) Paul Krugman, lying about the results of media studies of the Florida 2000 vote:
Two different news media consortiums reviewed Florida's ballots; both found that a full manual recount would have given the election to Mr. Gore.

Yet the truth is quite the opposite:
Read more... )

liberals, politics, paul krugman, judge john roberts

Leave a comment

Comments 9

felinoid August 20 2005, 07:47:07 UTC
You asked before why librals hate free speach. This is why.
They themselfs don't know when they are lying.

They tend to remember things being a bit more inline with what they believe than they really were.

Every time a study was done showing that Bush would have won the recount the Democrats shout over it clamming the study showed the opposate hoping people forget the actual report and remember only the false clame.

Over time they successfully sabotog there own memorys of events.

In psycology they call this a "Pathological lier"

Reply


anonymous August 20 2005, 09:18:48 UTC
still lying about Krugman as Enron "advisor"

perhaps you should note Bush, Ashcroft et al as enormous Enron beneficiaries and supporters. Ooops! That'd be too honest for our hobbyist friend

Reply

reality_hammer August 21 2005, 03:25:29 UTC
As I stated before, you need to educate yourself!

Krugman himself admits it, why can't you?

Reply


izuko August 20 2005, 11:19:26 UTC
They lie because they tend to get away with it.

Reply


pogo101 August 20 2005, 14:14:07 UTC
Krugman was telling one of those technical truths that he knows most people who aren't well-informed will misunderstand JUST AS HE HOPES THEY WILL.

Technically it is true that a "full manual recount" might have favored Gore. But Gore wasn't seeking that. He was seeking a partial (some counties only) manual recount. THe "full" part was something the two consortia did on their own. And actually, even the full (statewide) recount might not have favored Gore (sufficiently) ; it only would have swung the election to him if the election workers had viewed each dangling chad as had the consortium.

Reply


dmw3244 August 20 2005, 15:52:59 UTC
I wonder why the story didn't break that here in Philadelphia, the democrats would not teach a person who refused to say that she was democrat or republican to use the voting machines...oh yeah...that's right...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up